The Consent of the Governed

In 1985, the Oregon Supreme Court recognized in the case of Burt v. Blumenauer that the legitimacy of government policy is dependent upon the consent of the governed and  that excessive or questionable efforts by the government to manufacture the required consent calls the legitimacy of its actions into question.

After the Oregon legislators passed a law in 1975 which allowed them to join PERS, most legislators became PERS members.  In 1989, eighty-two of the ninety legislators were in PERS and they passed another law that made PERS funding the State’s highest financial priority.  Every Oregon public employer must now pay their PERS assessments before they can pay for anything else.  This spending priority policy is one of the principal reasons why public employers, including the state prison system, school districts, counties and cities, are forced to reduce the services they were created to provide in order to make their PERS payments.  Prisoners are released early, school teachers are laid off, class sizes are increased and teaching days reduced, police and fire protection is cut back.  There is no cut back, however, in the PERS payments that are made for the public employees who keep their jobs.  In fact, those PERS payments are expected to increase significantly in July, 2011 and that will result in even greater service reductions.   

Any explanation or attempted justification by the legislature of this spending policy has been questionable at best and the people have never consented to it.  As a result, the legitimacy of the policy is in question.  While the policy benefits those legislators who are PERS members and all other 320,000 PERS beneficiaries, it hurts, rather than helps, the other 3,500,000 Oregonians.    

The people have every right to demand an explanation as to why PERS must be paid first and if that explanation is not satisfactory the people have the right to change the policy.   If the legislature believes that PERS funding is entitled to first priority, it should submit the matter to a vote of the people.  That is the only way for such a policy to be legitimate in the eyes of the governed.


About Dan Re

I am an attorney who has lived in Bend and practiced law since 1981. In educating myself about the Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), I was shocked at how the PERS laws were changed by the legislature, once legislators were allowed to join PERS in 1971, 26 years after PERS was first created. Those changes personally benefitted the legislators who made them at the direct financial expense of the people they were elected to represent. That is wrong and I intend to change it. In 2009, I started a non-profit 501(c)(4) corporation, In RE The People, Inc., for the purpose of informing concerned citizens of what happened regarding PERS and other issues of social and civic importance. I then created this blog to further that objective.
This entry was posted in Oregon PERS. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s