Oregon’s Curious Election Law

An Oregon election law, ORS 260.532, prohibits a person from publishing a political advertisement or paying for a political advertisement with knowledge or reckless disregard that the advertisement contains a false statement of material fact relating to any candidate, political committee or measure.   A candidate with knowledge or reckless disregard that an advertisement contains a false statement violates this law even if the candidate did not participate in the advertisement’s publication.  There is a rebuttable presumption that a candidate knows of and consents to the use of a false statement that is published by the candidate’s political committee. 

If this law is violated, there are two potential sanctions for the dishonest candidate or political committee.  First, any candidate or political committee harmed by the false statement can recover damages and the offending party may be required to publish a retraction of the false statement.  Second, if the false statement was deliberately made or deliberately caused to be made by a candidate and if it is determined that the candidate’s false statement reversed the election, that candidate will be deprived of the office to which he or she was elected, unless that candidate was  elected to the Oregon Senate or the Oregon House. Persons deliberately making false statements who are elected to the House or Senate may have to pay damages but they still get to serve as a state Senator or Representative.

The exclusion of a person running for the Oregon Senate or House from this office forfeiture law is more than curious.   Why should the Governor, the Attorney General, the Secretary of State, the State Treasure, Judges and all other elected officials be subject to losing office for deliberately making false statements, when no such penalty exists for legislators who deliberately make false statements?  One obvious reason is because the legislators make the laws and they know that false statements about their opponent in a close election  can be very effective. 

The law protecting legislators from losing their office for deliberately making false statements may be good for some bad legislators but it is not good for Oregon.  It prevents the people from getting accurate information and it encourages dishonesty in the legislative process.  A person elected by deliberately making false statements is not likely to change his or her ways once in the legislature.  Oregon can do better than this.


About Dan Re

I am an attorney who has lived in Bend and practiced law since 1981. In educating myself about the Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), I was shocked at how the PERS laws were changed by the legislature, once legislators were allowed to join PERS in 1971, 26 years after PERS was first created. Those changes personally benefitted the legislators who made them at the direct financial expense of the people they were elected to represent. That is wrong and I intend to change it. In 2009, I started a non-profit 501(c)(4) corporation, In RE The People, Inc., for the purpose of informing concerned citizens of what happened regarding PERS and other issues of social and civic importance. I then created this blog to further that objective.
This entry was posted in Oregon PERS. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s