UPDATE 3: The Fight To Reinstate Ballot Measure 8

My lawsuit to reinstate Ballot Measure 8 is slowly progressing.  It is in the earliest stage of determining  who will be the judge.  Under Oregon law, the general rule is that all elected judges and those that are appointed to fill a vacancy in an elected judge position  automatically become PERS members the minute they take office.  That gives each one of those judges a financial stake in the outcome of any PERS case they hear.

If my lawsuit is successful, drastic changes would be made to PERS which would  reduce PERS benefits  effective as of January 1, 1995.   The judge who would normally hear my case is a PERS member and, as a result, that judge has a direct financial interest in the outcome of the case.  That disqualifies him from hearing my case under Oregon law, under the Oregon Code of Judicial Conduct and, in this case, under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution.   I am arguing that the judge must step down immediately so that a non-PERS judge can be appointed to hear the case.

The Oregon Department of Revenue has appeared in the case and is telling the judge that he can still act as the judge despite his clear financial conflict.  Of course, the Oregon Department of Justice attorney who is making that argument on the Department’s behalf is also a PERS member.  So are all of the employees  of the Department of Revenue.  Everyone involved in the case, except for me, is a PERS member and they all have a financial interest in the outcome of the case. 

The Department’s legal obligation is to administer the Oregon tax laws for the benefit of all Oregonians, not just for the benefit of PERS members but with the conflict of interest that all Department employees have it is very difficult for them to do that.  Especially when the attorney who is representing them is also a PERS member who has the same conflict.   The Department is not getting the independent advice it needs to carry out its responsibilities.

The current PERS control over Oregon is fundamentally unfair and one objective of my lawsuit is to break that control.   I will keep you updated as events occur.

Advertisements

About Dan Re

I am an attorney who has lived in Bend and practiced law since 1981. In educating myself about the Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), I was shocked at how the PERS laws were changed by the legislature, once legislators were allowed to join PERS in 1971, 26 years after PERS was first created. Those changes personally benefitted the legislators who made them at the direct financial expense of the people they were elected to represent. That is wrong and I intend to change it. In 2009, I started a non-profit 501(c)(4) corporation, In RE The People, Inc., for the purpose of informing concerned citizens of what happened regarding PERS and other issues of social and civic importance. I then created this blog to further that objective.
This entry was posted in Oregon PERS. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s