Can The Oregon Legislature Take Away The Federal Constitutional Right To Due Process? Part 2

In 1983, the Oregon legislature passed a law that made all persons becoming a judge in 1984 or later PERS members.  Persons who were judges prior to 1984, were offered a 7% salary increase to join PERS.  Before this new law went into effect, Oregon’s judges had their own separate retirement plan, the Judges Retirement Fund.  Since the judges were not PERS members before 1984, they did not have a financial conflict of interest in any PERS case.  After the law went into effect, however, every Oregon judge had a financial conflict of interest in every PERS cases.

The due process clause of the US constitution guarantees a person the right to a judge who does not have a financial interest in the outcome of the case when the state wants to take that person’s property.   After all Oregon judges were made PERS members the only way independent judge could hear PERS cases was by appointing temporary judges to hear those cases but the Oregon judges have not done so.  They have not even been asked to do so until 2011.  I asked them to appoint temporary non-PERS judges to hear my PERS tax refund case but they declined to do so.  Instead, they have decided PERS cases themselves.

I believe the decisions by the judges to hear PERS cases is unconstitutional.  The rule known as the separate application of a statute requires the judges to appoint temporary non-PERS judges to hear PERS cases if the law permits them to do so and Oregon law does permit that to happen.  I also believe that any PERS case decided by PERS judges is void.  That means the decision in such a case never existed. This issue is again pending in the Oregon Court of Appeals in Re v. Public Employee Retirement System.  That case will eventually decide whether a state legislature can terminate federal constitutional rights.  I do not think any state legislature can do that under the circumstance that existed with the Oregon judges and PERS.  I will continue to press that issue in court until it is specifically addressed and decided.  Most likely, that will occur in federal court.


About Dan Re

I am an attorney who has lived in Bend and practiced law since 1981. In educating myself about the Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), I was shocked at how the PERS laws were changed by the legislature, once legislators were allowed to join PERS in 1971, 26 years after PERS was first created. Those changes personally benefitted the legislators who made them at the direct financial expense of the people they were elected to represent. That is wrong and I intend to change it. In 2009, I started a non-profit 501(c)(4) corporation, In RE The People, Inc., for the purpose of informing concerned citizens of what happened regarding PERS and other issues of social and civic importance. I then created this blog to further that objective.
This entry was posted in Oregon PERS. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s