Update 11: The Fight To Reinstate Ballot Measure 8

On January 19, 2012, PERS became the first state agency to file an argument in the Oregon courts supporting the ability of judges who are PERS members to decide PERS cases.  The following is an AP news article about this action.

The Register-Guard http://www.registerguard.com/

State defends public retirement rulings

By Jeff Barnard

The Associated Press

Published: Friday, Jan 20, 2012 01:06PM

The state of Oregon is defending court rulings that have stymied legislative efforts to overhaul the pension system for public employees.

A brief filed Thursday in the Oregon Court of Appeals argues that the “rule of necessity” allows Oregon Supreme Court justices to decide a case concerning the pensions they themselves receive, if there are no other judges to take their places. Virtually all judges in Oregon are on the pension plan, leaving none to be temporarily appointed to hear the case.

The state Attorney General’s Office adds that there is no provision in state law to temporarily appoint non-judges to the state’s highest court.

The response comes in a lawsuit trying to overturn two state Supreme Court rulings that prohibit rolling back benefits already promised to retirees.

One overturned a 1994 ballot measure that limited public pension benefits. Pushed by initiative guru Bill Sizemore and passed by a narrow margin, the measure would have required public employees to contribute 6 percent of their salary to the Public Employees Retirement System, prohibited a guaranteed rate of return for pensions and made it illegal for employees to boost their pensions with unused sick time.

The other ruling said the state can’t roll back benefits already promised to retirees. That lawsuit from Bend attorney Daniel Re argues that the court should have appointed lawyers as temporary district court judges, then put them on the high court.

“It is very significant as it is the first time that a state agency has filed an argument supporting the right of PERS judges to decide PERS cases,” Re said in an email.

Re has declined to name the donors to the nonprofit organization that is paying for the lawsuit.


About Dan Re

I am an attorney who has lived in Bend and practiced law since 1981. In educating myself about the Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), I was shocked at how the PERS laws were changed by the legislature, once legislators were allowed to join PERS in 1971, 26 years after PERS was first created. Those changes personally benefitted the legislators who made them at the direct financial expense of the people they were elected to represent. That is wrong and I intend to change it. In 2009, I started a non-profit 501(c)(4) corporation, In RE The People, Inc., for the purpose of informing concerned citizens of what happened regarding PERS and other issues of social and civic importance. I then created this blog to further that objective.
This entry was posted in Ballot Measure 8, Oregon judges, Oregon legislature, Oregon PERS, PERS Pick Up and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s