PERS Judges, Would Turnabout Be Fair Play?

In 1943, the Oregon legislature created a retirement plan for Oregon’s judges.  Two years later, the legislature created PERS.  For the next thirty-eight years, the judges remained in their separate retirement plan and could not join PERS.  This fact insured that PERS lawsuits would be decided by judges who did not have a direct, substantial interest in the case.

When PERS was first created in 1945, Oregon legislators were also prohibited from joining PERS.  The PERS prohibition for legislators, however, was removed by the Oregon Attorney General in 1971.   Between 1971 and 1981, PERS legislators doubled PERS benefits.  In 1983, 84 of the 90 legislators had joined PERS and to protect the PERS benefit enhancements they had put in place during 1971 – 1981, they passed a law that put the Oregon judges into PERS.

If the 1983 law required all PERS cases to be decided by PERS judges, the legislature would have stacked the deck in favor of PERS members in every PERS lawsuit.    The 1983 law did not say that every PERS cases had to be decided by PERS judges, but that is the position the Oregon Supreme Court has taken.  Numerous post-1983 court decisions have held when it comes to PERS lawsuits, PERS judges are entitled to be the judge of their own case, even though that position is repugnant to the concept of fundamental fairness.

I do not believe that the legislature gave PERS judges the right to decide PERS cases and I have asserted that argument in a case pending in the Oregon Court of Appeals.  But, assuming that the legislature did give PERS judges the right to decide PERS cases and assuming further that the legislature had the power to enact such a law, a very interesting opportunity would exist for future legislatures.  Nothing would prevent the legislature from creating a new retirement plan for judges and requiring every judge to join that plan.   The new retirement plan could provide that every time a judicial decision that reduced PERS benefits became final, a percentage of the savings in PERS funding that resulted from that decision would go into the judges’ new retirement plan.

The suggestion that the legislature could pass such a law seems absurd but that is what the Oregon courts have repeatedly held that the legislature did when it required the judges to join PERS.  Look at Ballot Measure 8. That measure eliminated three PERS benefits that PERS judges and most other PERS members were receiving: the pick up of their employee contributions; a guaranteed minimum rate of return on their employee accounts; and, the use of unused sick leave to determine their final average salary.  When the people passed Ballot Measure 8, PERS benefits for the judges and other PERS members were reduced.  But when the judges later invalidated Ballot Measure 8, they made a final decision that increased PERS benefits and they received a share of that increase.

Would turnabout be fair play?


About Dan Re

I am an attorney who has lived in Bend and practiced law since 1981. In educating myself about the Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), I was shocked at how the PERS laws were changed by the legislature, once legislators were allowed to join PERS in 1971, 26 years after PERS was first created. Those changes personally benefitted the legislators who made them at the direct financial expense of the people they were elected to represent. That is wrong and I intend to change it. In 2009, I started a non-profit 501(c)(4) corporation, In RE The People, Inc., for the purpose of informing concerned citizens of what happened regarding PERS and other issues of social and civic importance. I then created this blog to further that objective.
This entry was posted in Ballot Measure 8, fundamental fairness, Oregon judges, Oregon PERS, PERS Pick Up and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s