UPDATE To PERS Justice In Oregon and SB 822

The following New Paragraph supplements the information contained in my post of  September 17, 2013 about PERS Justice in Oregon and SB 822.  It further illustrates the absolute power PERS members have over the PERS laws and the injustice that has been forced upon the people of Oregon.  PERS was not originally set up this way.  During its first twenty-five years, legislators and judges were not PERS members.  During this period, PERS retirement benefits remained constant at 50% of final average salary after a full career.  Only after legislators were allowed to join in 1971 by the Attorney General did the benefits escalate and only after judges were forced to join PERS did the judges decide that PERS benefits were a contract that only PERS members could modify.  I believe that the PERS changes made by PERS legislators and PERS judges are invalid.  I am dedicated to having those  laws and court decisions thrown out.

NEW PARAGRAPH:  In addition to the PERS conflict of interest that exists for the Supreme Court justices and the special master in the SB 822 litigation, there is another player in the lawsuit that also has the same conflict.  One of the parties to the suit is the State of Oregon, which represents the interests of all Oregonians.  The State of Oregon is represented in the lawsuit by the Oregon Attorney General and Assistant Attorney Generals.  All of those persons are also PERS members and if SB 822 is upheld, the stand to lose retirement benefits.  It is beyond dispute that the PERS justice system in Oregon is totally controlled by PERS members.

Dan Re

Advertisements

About Dan Re

I am an attorney who has lived in Bend and practiced law since 1981. In educating myself about the Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), I was shocked at how the PERS laws were changed by the legislature, once legislators were allowed to join PERS in 1971, 26 years after PERS was first created. Those changes personally benefitted the legislators who made them at the direct financial expense of the people they were elected to represent. That is wrong and I intend to change it. In 2009, I started a non-profit 501(c)(4) corporation, In RE The People, Inc., for the purpose of informing concerned citizens of what happened regarding PERS and other issues of social and civic importance. I then created this blog to further that objective.
This entry was posted in Oregon judges, Oregon legislators, Oregon PERS, Oregon SB 822, public employee retirement system and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s