Responses Filed To Motions To Disqualify Justices in SB 822 Litigation

On October 17, 2013, responses were filed to COID’s motions to disqualify the Justices of the Oregon Supreme Court and the Special Master appointed by the Supreme Court to propose facts upon which the SB 822 litigation will be determined.  Responses were filed by certain PERS members who are suing to have SB 822 declared invalid, by the City of Portland, by the League of Oregon Cities and, most surprisingly of all, by the State of Oregon.   All of the responses argued that the Supreme Court Justices and the Special Master should not be disqualified despite the fact that all of them are PERS members and their retirement benefits may be reduced if SB 822 is upheld.  Basically, these parties prefer to have the SB 822 case decided by judges who are PERS members rather than by judges who are impartial.

The fact that the State of Oregon filed a response is surprising because it’s the role in the case is to defend SB 822.  It is hard to imagine that your chances of successfully defending a law in court is better when the judges who will decide the case may very likely lose money if the law is upheld.  But that is what the State has done.

COID now has until October 24, to file a reply to those responses and then the Supreme Court will rule on COID’s motions.

Dan Re

About Dan Re

I am an attorney who has lived in Bend and practiced law since 1981. In educating myself about the Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), I was shocked at how the PERS laws were changed by the legislature, once legislators were allowed to join PERS in 1971, 26 years after PERS was first created. Those changes personally benefitted the legislators who made them at the direct financial expense of the people they were elected to represent. That is wrong and I intend to change it. In 2009, I started a non-profit 501(c)(4) corporation, In RE The People, Inc., for the purpose of informing concerned citizens of what happened regarding PERS and other issues of social and civic importance. I then created this blog to further that objective.
This entry was posted in fundamental fairness, Oregon judges, Oregon legislators, Oregon PERS, Oregon SB 822 and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s