Category Archives: public employee retirement system

Oregonian Guest Editorial October 30, 2013

The following is a Guest Editorial that I wrote which was published in the Oregonian on October 30, 2013. Dan Re PERS decisions undermined by conflicts of interest in Oregon courts: Guest opinion Guest Columnist By Guest Columnist The Oregonian … Continue reading

Posted in fundamental fairness, Oregon judges, Oregon PERS, Oregon SB 822, public employee retirement system | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Are Judges Really PERS Members? You Bet They Are.

Many PERS members argue that there is no problem in having judges who are PERS members decide PERS cases because the judges are not really part of the same PERS retirement system that other public employees are in.  But that argument is … Continue reading

Posted in Oregon judges, Oregon PERS, Pick Up, public employee retirement system | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

UPDATE To PERS Justice In Oregon and SB 822

The following New Paragraph supplements the information contained in my post of  September 17, 2013 about PERS Justice in Oregon and SB 822.  It further illustrates the absolute power PERS members have over the PERS laws and the injustice that has … Continue reading

Posted in Oregon judges, Oregon legislators, Oregon PERS, Oregon SB 822, public employee retirement system | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

PERS Justice In Oregon And SB 822

The 2013 Oregon Legislative Assembly passed SB 822, which reduced two PERS benefits.  The benefits reduced were:  (1) annual cost of living increases for retired PERS members; and, (2) the elimination of increased retirement benefits for retired PERS members who are not … Continue reading

Posted in Oregon judges, Oregon legislators, Oregon PERS, Oregon SB 822, public employee retirement system | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Oregon Supreme Court Denies Petition For Review

On July 25, 2013, the Oregon Supreme Court denied my petition for review of the Court of Appeals case that refused to have non-PERS judges decide Re v. PERS.  The Supreme Court’s decision means that under current Oregon law all … Continue reading

Posted in fundamental fairness, Oregon judges, Oregon PERS, public employee retirement system | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

UPDATE: DANIEL C. RE v. PERS

In April, 2013, the Oregon Court of Appeals denied my request to have my lawsuit, Daniel C. Re v. PERS decided by judges who are not PERS members.  The Court held that the rule of necessity applied to this case and … Continue reading

Posted in fundamental fairness, Oregon judges, Oregon PERS, public employee retirement system, rule of necessity | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

HB 2451 – It Requires Fairness For All

HB 2451, introduced in the Oregon legislature on January 14, 2013, will provide all Oregonians with greater protection than currently exists, the right to have every Oregon lawsuit presided over by an impartial judge or panel of judges.  The right … Continue reading

Posted in Oregon judges, Oregon legislators, Oregon legislature, Oregon PERS, public employee retirement system | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment